Friday, November 29, 2013

New York City Gun Confiscations Have Begun

(courtesy Mrgunsngear's Facebook page)

The Truth about Guns

New York’s SAFE Act is a bad, bad thing. It requires people to register, sell or transfer (out of state) “assault rifles” and “high capacity” magazines. Many Empire State gun and standard capacity ammunition magazine owners have complied. Many have not. So, at some point, the State’s gonna go get ‘em. People on both sides of the law enforcement divide will die and the s will hit the fan. 

Funny we didn't see any bloodshed in Illinois or California where police have gone to collect guns from prohibited people. Why would we see it in New York City?

We won't, that's the answer. This is more of the laughable gun-nut self-aggrandizing nonsense that we've come to expect from them.  This is just more tough talk from weak insecure men who are anything but tough.  They fantasize about shootouts with the oppressive government thugs who are taking their freedoms away, but practically none of them have the stomach for it. Supposedly 3% of gun owners are of this intrepid type.  I think it's really more like .003%.

What's your opinion?  Please leave a comment.

10 comments:

  1. Didn't you promise us that confiscation wouldn't happen? How about you deal with that lie first?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The law changed. They are now in violation of the law. They must surrender their gun. Of course you will continue to violate the law and convince others to violate the law.

      Delete
    2. In other words, you just admitted that there are confiscations, despite the promises of gun control freaks that such would never happen.

      Delete
    3. Not at all liar, criminal. The law changed making certain guns illegal. To bad for you, now go break some more laws ass hole. How about responding to the criminal statements you made that Steve posted, which you claim are not? What a coward liar.

      Delete
    4. Greg, you're pulling some semantic bullshit on us now. There always have been confiscations just like there have always been bans. But when you guys use those words, you intend total civilian disarmament. That's what we've always said is not going to happen, and it still isn't.

      Delete
    5. Japete, for example, has insisted that guns weren't confiscated in Britain. Her claim is that since the owners were compensated, that doesn't count. You promise us that government won't come after all of our guns, but you keep forgetting that you have zero credibility. You also ignore the progressive reduction in allowed guns in places like New York.

      Fortunately, your side is as stupid as you believe us to be.

      Delete
  2. What part of shall not be infringed do ppl not understand? Does the liberal who wrote this own a gun? So you are saying its ok to take away guns from people? And what do you know about gun owners? Were all hollywood wannabees waiting for a shootout? What gives you the right to make a blanket judgemental statement of how gun owners are? Do you know them and hang out with them? Do you shoot? Do you know anything about the constitution or should I just paint you as a socialist commie loving liberal that all of you are? Before you point fingers at ppl do your research in history and take a trip to england and ask the good ole britts how they are enjoying gun confiscation. And to think you call ppl weak and what a joke it is that you write here and you don't have the guts at all to even defend the country or the constitution- all you did is point fingers and call names with zero factual information- sounds like 3rd grade to me.
    Go buy a gun learn to shoot and certainly begin to understand your freedom.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous, you sound like a real kool-aid drinkin' gun nut. Why don't you give yourself a name and offer us some more of your razor-sharp observations?

      Delete
  3. I believe that, unfortunately, Mike is correct in his assessment of the tepid resistance we’ll see from gun lovers when mandatory disarmament begins. Americans are just too damn comfortable and invested in their lives to offer any REAL resistance (harsh language aside).

    Does anyone REALLY believe that “man” who’s allowed himself to be bullied in to wearing pink an entire month each year is suddenly going to rise up and in doing so give up his home, truck, family, food, money, etc, and (now that all of that Homeland Security money has allowed every little burg in this country to build its own SWAT team) his radically shortened life the day when the shock troops rap on his door and order him to hand over his weapons...ALL of which they probably have on file? Ever buy ammo with a credit card? Oopsie...

    Oh, I put myself right in there with the shit-talkers. Admittedly, the thought of saying NO!” has crossed my mind. I own an “assault” rifle that I bough for hunting. I am missing an entire arm and, so far anyway, it’s the only rifle short powerful and light enough for me to actually hit that at which I am aiming. As a student of history I also get nervous when governments begin disarming citizens, Again, however, we’ve allowed our government to fuck us over for more than a century now--nary a shot fired, unless you count a few rounds popped off at presidents. Perhaps the remaining intrepid bloodlines from the Revolutionary and Civil Wars were completely severed in WWII.

    I certainly don’t have the stuff to be counted among them. They’ve weakened me with air conditioning and fast food. and where the hell would I get my prescriptions?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "“man” who’s allowed himself to be bullied in to wearing pink an entire month each year "

      What does that mean?

      Delete