Friday, March 16, 2012

The Bible Belt Loves Gay Porn


10 comments:

  1. Big deal. I do have to wonder how the data were gathered. Apparently, Google keeps far too much information about its users.

    ReplyDelete
  2. "Google keeps far too much information about its users."

    There IS a way to solve that problem, stop downloading porn from the internet and do it the old fashioned, driving into a town, three counties over from where you live, that has an "adult books, films and novelties" shop.

    Arkansas, fourth of the ten? So it's not JUST gunz that you folks obsess about.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Is there any level of control and monitoring by big business and big government that bothers you, Democommie? Google keeps lots of information about its users, though you're apparently unaware of the problem that this raises. No, you keep yammering about what you're supposed to go on about while the big problems happen outside of your attention.

      Delete
    2. You could wear those Groucho Marx eyeglasses with the nose and eyebrows. And a trench coat, of course.

      Delete
  3. They got it all wrong. Rick Santorum is not against porn, he is only against illegal porn. It says so right here:

    http://www.ricksantorum.com/enforcing-laws-against-illegal-pornography

    He is not looking to pass any new laws; he’ll just install an AG who will work behind the scenes. Law abiding masturbators have nothing to fear.

    (hmm, this sounds familiar…)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Illegal pornography? I'm curious, where in the Constitution does it give the Congress or the president the authority to make laws or give dictates on sex, personal preference, voluntary exchanges, or anything else involved in porn. It simply is none of their business.
      It would be up to the states to write and enforce any of their own laws.
      orlin sellers

      Delete
  4. I think the big deal is two things.

    For things that are vices like porn, drugs, alcohol, etc., prohibition makes them even more desirable. Guns aren't included in that because they're not a vice.

    There's gigantic hypocrisy in those Southern States.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for acknowledging that guns aren't a vice. We're making progress here.

      Delete
  5. "Google keeps lots of information about its users, though you're apparently unaware of the problem that this raises. No, you keep yammering about what you're supposed to go on about while the big problems happen outside of your attention."

    Believe it or not, shit-for-brains, I'm well aware of what Google does. I'm also well aware that they ARE willing to give information to the gummint. You and the rest of your gunzloonz pals who use the internetz to brag about your gunz collectionz, while simultaneousl complaining about gummint overreach are demonstrably oblivious.

    "Thanks for acknowledging that guns aren't a vice. We're making progress here."

    Well, Mikeb302000 was being sarcastic but that probably went right over floppy hat enclosed head.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Some of us are concerned with government overreach in general, while idiots like Democommie only care about one thing. What we see here is that when people accept control and intrusion, they become thorough converts to being sheep.

      Delete